https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172401 A writ court will ordinarily decline interference where a party challenges jurisdiction for the first time after inviting a statutory authority's decision without objecting before that authority or the tribunal. The distinction between patent and latent lack of jurisdiction was considered, but the relevant provisions did not make the absence of jurisdiction obvious on the face of the statute; in the absence of any satisfactory explanation for the failure to raise the point earlier, discretionary relief under Article 226 was refused and the jurisdictional challenge rejected. en-us Thu, 03 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:54:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172401 A writ court will ordinarily decline interference where a party challenges jurisdiction for the first time after inviting a statutory authority's decision without objecting before that authority or the tribunal. The distinction between patent and latent lack of jurisdiction was considered, but the relevant provisions did not make the absence of jurisdiction obvious on the face of the statute; in the absence of any satisfactory explanation for the failure to raise the point earlier, discretionary relief under Article 226 was refused and the jurisdictional challenge rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172401