<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 968 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172370</link>
    <description>Where an assessee&#039;s liability had already been negatived by the appellate authority, there was no basis for granting stay pending appeal. The liability would remain postponed until the appellant succeeded in the appeal, but that did not justify interim relief on the facts stated. The stay petition was therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:39:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=394000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 968 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172370</link>
      <description>Where an assessee&#039;s liability had already been negatived by the appellate authority, there was no basis for granting stay pending appeal. The liability would remain postponed until the appellant succeeded in the appeal, but that did not justify interim relief on the facts stated. The stay petition was therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>