<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 739 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262822</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the demands raised by the authorities, as the allegations of clandestine removal were not substantiated. The Court emphasized the importance of considering all explanations and evidence provided by the appellant and ensuring accurate interpretations of statements and facts. The lower authorities&#039; findings were deemed legally unsustainable due to erroneous interpretations, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 739 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262822</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the demands raised by the authorities, as the allegations of clandestine removal were not substantiated. The Court emphasized the importance of considering all explanations and evidence provided by the appellant and ensuring accurate interpretations of statements and facts. The lower authorities&#039; findings were deemed legally unsustainable due to erroneous interpretations, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>