<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 735 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262818</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, directing that they should have been filed with the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. The Department was granted liberty to file an appeal with the High Court within two months, to be considered on merits without limitation grounds. The High Court was tasked with determining if any substantial question of law arose during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:11:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 735 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262818</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, directing that they should have been filed with the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act. The Department was granted liberty to file an appeal with the High Court within two months, to be considered on merits without limitation grounds. The High Court was tasked with determining if any substantial question of law arose during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>