https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262815 The Supreme Court applied binding precedent and held that the dispute was covered by Thermax Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Customs. The Tribunal had correctly relied on that earlier decision, and the Court found no reason to depart from the settled position on the facts and legal question before it. As the case fell within the scope of Thermax, the appeals could not be sustained and were dismissed. en-us Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:10:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262815 The Supreme Court applied binding precedent and held that the dispute was covered by Thermax Pvt. Ltd. v. Collector of Customs. The Tribunal had correctly relied on that earlier decision, and the Court found no reason to depart from the settled position on the facts and legal question before it. As the case fell within the scope of Thermax, the appeals could not be sustained and were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262815