<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 730 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262813</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Revenue&#039;s preliminary objection, ruling that the appeals were not maintainable before the High Court. The court found that the issues related to the rate of duty and valuation fell outside the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction. Additionally, the court determined that the CESTAT&#039;s order was reasoned and not a non-speaking order. As a result, the appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 730 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262813</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Revenue&#039;s preliminary objection, ruling that the appeals were not maintainable before the High Court. The court found that the issues related to the rate of duty and valuation fell outside the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction. Additionally, the court determined that the CESTAT&#039;s order was reasoned and not a non-speaking order. As a result, the appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>