<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 726 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262809</link>
    <description>Appeals were dismissed solely because the tax effect was nominal, and the Court confined its disposal to that ground. No examination of the substantive merits or detailed reasoning on the underlying issues was undertaken, so the decision operates only as a dismissal based on low tax effect and not as a ruling on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 726 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262809</link>
      <description>Appeals were dismissed solely because the tax effect was nominal, and the Court confined its disposal to that ground. No examination of the substantive merits or detailed reasoning on the underlying issues was undertaken, so the decision operates only as a dismissal based on low tax effect and not as a ruling on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>