<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 712 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of foreign currency communication expenses from both &quot;export turnover&quot; and &quot;total turnover&quot; for deduction under Section 10A. It directed the application of a 15% RPT filter and turnover filter excluding companies over Rs. 200 Crores. The Tribunal reversed the exclusion of companies with profit margins over 50%, remanding for further investigation. It disallowed the standard deduction of 5% for ALP computation and remanded issues of miscellaneous income and depreciation adjustment for re-examination. Certain comparables were excluded based on functional differences. The decision provided detailed directions for re-examination, partly allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 712 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of foreign currency communication expenses from both &quot;export turnover&quot; and &quot;total turnover&quot; for deduction under Section 10A. It directed the application of a 15% RPT filter and turnover filter excluding companies over Rs. 200 Crores. The Tribunal reversed the exclusion of companies with profit margins over 50%, remanding for further investigation. It disallowed the standard deduction of 5% for ALP computation and remanded issues of miscellaneous income and depreciation adjustment for re-examination. Certain comparables were excluded based on functional differences. The decision provided detailed directions for re-examination, partly allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>