<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 574 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172337</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Tribunal&#039;s grant of relief to the assessee regarding the benefit of notification for warehoused goods upon withdrawal of warehousing facility was upheld. The court found no substantial question of law involved, leading to the dismissal of the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 574 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172337</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Tribunal&#039;s grant of relief to the assessee regarding the benefit of notification for warehoused goods upon withdrawal of warehousing facility was upheld. The court found no substantial question of law involved, leading to the dismissal of the appeal in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>