<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 567 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172322</link>
    <description>Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was considered in relation to bagasse, with the Tribunal noting prior decisions that treated bagasse as waste and not a final product. On that basis, the 8% reversal requirement was found inapplicable, so the demand and penalty confirmed on that footing could not survive. The discussion emphasises that a credit reversal provision tied to final products does not extend to a residue or waste product such as bagasse. Relief was therefore granted against the duty and penalty demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 567 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172322</link>
      <description>Rule 57CC of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was considered in relation to bagasse, with the Tribunal noting prior decisions that treated bagasse as waste and not a final product. On that basis, the 8% reversal requirement was found inapplicable, so the demand and penalty confirmed on that footing could not survive. The discussion emphasises that a credit reversal provision tied to final products does not extend to a residue or waste product such as bagasse. Relief was therefore granted against the duty and penalty demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>