https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172320 Certiorari under Article 227 is confined to correcting jurisdictional errors, breaches of natural justice, and errors of law apparent on the face of the record; it does not permit appellate reappreciation or detailed reasoning review. On that standard, the High Court could not interfere with the Tribunal's view on whether a landlord had to give prior notice terminating tenancy before seeking possession under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The issue required examination of Sections 14, 24 and 25, together with Section 3 of that Act and Section 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. As the alleged error was not self-evident without extended argument, no error apparent on the face of the record was shown. en-us Fri, 25 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 May 2026 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172320 Certiorari under Article 227 is confined to correcting jurisdictional errors, breaches of natural justice, and errors of law apparent on the face of the record; it does not permit appellate reappreciation or detailed reasoning review. On that standard, the High Court could not interfere with the Tribunal's view on whether a landlord had to give prior notice terminating tenancy before seeking possession under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The issue required examination of Sections 14, 24 and 25, together with Section 3 of that Act and Section 111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. As the alleged error was not self-evident without extended argument, no error apparent on the face of the record was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Sep 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172320