<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 907 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172316</link>
    <description>Performance bonus received after clearance of goods under a supply contract was not part of the assessable value for central excise duty because it related to better performance in use and not to the value of the manufactured goods at removal. On that basis, the duty demand could not be sustained, and the consequential levy of interest and penalty also failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 907 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172316</link>
      <description>Performance bonus received after clearance of goods under a supply contract was not part of the assessable value for central excise duty because it related to better performance in use and not to the value of the manufactured goods at removal. On that basis, the duty demand could not be sustained, and the consequential levy of interest and penalty also failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>