<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (9) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172310</link>
    <description>A corrupt practice charge in an election petition may be sustained where the pleadings fairly raise the substance of bribery and the evidence proves the alleged bargain, even if fuller particulars are absent, provided the respondent is not misled or prejudiced. The proviso to section 99 was construed as protecting only persons who have not already had an opportunity to participate in the trial; a candidate who is already a party to the petition need not receive fresh notice before being named as having committed a corrupt practice. The discussion concludes that the tribunal&#039;s finding was upheld on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:18:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (9) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172310</link>
      <description>A corrupt practice charge in an election petition may be sustained where the pleadings fairly raise the substance of bribery and the evidence proves the alleged bargain, even if fuller particulars are absent, provided the respondent is not misled or prejudiced. The proviso to section 99 was construed as protecting only persons who have not already had an opportunity to participate in the trial; a candidate who is already a party to the petition need not receive fresh notice before being named as having committed a corrupt practice. The discussion concludes that the tribunal&#039;s finding was upheld on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>