https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262768 The tribunal held that the appellant satisfied the conditions under Rule 3(2) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005, as the services were exported and utilized outside India, and remuneration was received in convertible foreign exchange. The remittance was found to be in order and received in foreign currency. The tribunal remanded the matter to examine the correlation of export invoices with FIRC. Costs for Rent-a-Cab service and life insurance for staff were deemed eligible as input services. The tribunal allowed the appeals, except for one partially remanded for further review on correlation issues. en-us Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262768 The tribunal held that the appellant satisfied the conditions under Rule 3(2) of the Export of Service Rules, 2005, as the services were exported and utilized outside India, and remuneration was received in convertible foreign exchange. The remittance was found to be in order and received in foreign currency. The tribunal remanded the matter to examine the correlation of export invoices with FIRC. Costs for Rent-a-Cab service and life insurance for staff were deemed eligible as input services. The tribunal allowed the appeals, except for one partially remanded for further review on correlation issues. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262768