<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 678 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262761</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal solely because the tax effect was minimal, recording that the dispute involved only Rs. 1.89 lakhs. The monetary threshold was determinative, and no other legal question or substantive reasoning was addressed. The operative effect was dismissal of the appeal on the ground of de minimis tax impact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:49:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 678 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262761</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal solely because the tax effect was minimal, recording that the dispute involved only Rs. 1.89 lakhs. The monetary threshold was determinative, and no other legal question or substantive reasoning was addressed. The operative effect was dismissal of the appeal on the ground of de minimis tax impact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>