<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 676 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262759</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, imposed costs on the respondent department, directed the completion of pending actions, and emphasized the significance of adhering to court orders to uphold the rule of law and prevent further delays and non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 676 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262759</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, imposed costs on the respondent department, directed the completion of pending actions, and emphasized the significance of adhering to court orders to uphold the rule of law and prevent further delays and non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>