<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 674 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262757</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both bail applications, holding that the offences under Section 135 of the Customs Act were non-bailable due to the total market price exceeding one crore rupees and evasion of duty exceeding fifty lakh rupees. The court emphasized the continuous nature of the offence and the importance of considering national interest in economic offences, denying bail based on the gravity of the offence and potential for repetition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 674 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262757</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both bail applications, holding that the offences under Section 135 of the Customs Act were non-bailable due to the total market price exceeding one crore rupees and evasion of duty exceeding fifty lakh rupees. The court emphasized the continuous nature of the offence and the importance of considering national interest in economic offences, denying bail based on the gravity of the offence and potential for repetition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>