<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 592 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172302</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held in the case of Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Indore, that when a compendious order disposes of multiple Show Cause Notices (SCNs), only one appeal is required to be filed, regardless of whether the order was passed at the stage of Order-in-Original or Order-in-Appeal. The Tribunal clarified that filing a single appeal against an order dealing with multiple SCNs is not irregular and emphasized that the view of the larger bench prevails in case of conflicting decisions. Therefore, a single appeal against an order related to multiple SCNs is deemed maintainable, providing clarity on the procedural aspect of filing appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 592 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172302</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held in the case of Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Indore, that when a compendious order disposes of multiple Show Cause Notices (SCNs), only one appeal is required to be filed, regardless of whether the order was passed at the stage of Order-in-Original or Order-in-Appeal. The Tribunal clarified that filing a single appeal against an order dealing with multiple SCNs is not irregular and emphasized that the view of the larger bench prevails in case of conflicting decisions. Therefore, a single appeal against an order related to multiple SCNs is deemed maintainable, providing clarity on the procedural aspect of filing appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>