<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 471 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172300</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Joint Commissioner&#039;s decision classifying goods as printed labels under Heading 4821.00, rejecting the department&#039;s claim of them being printed packing material under Heading 4811.00. The acceptance of declarations for previous years, reliance on test reports indicating the goods as &quot;Paper Board Labels,&quot; and physical inspection supporting the classification as labels led to the Tribunal dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 471 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172300</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Joint Commissioner&#039;s decision classifying goods as printed labels under Heading 4821.00, rejecting the department&#039;s claim of them being printed packing material under Heading 4811.00. The acceptance of declarations for previous years, reliance on test reports indicating the goods as &quot;Paper Board Labels,&quot; and physical inspection supporting the classification as labels led to the Tribunal dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>