<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (11) TMI 36 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172291</link>
    <description>The term &quot;minerals&quot; in section 231 of the Marwar Land Revenue Act was construed in its statutory and historical context, not as a narrow reference only to substances excavated from mines. Given the former State&#039;s treatment of salt as a controlled natural resource and its historical ownership and regulation of salt production, salt fell within the expression &quot;minerals&quot; even when produced by surface evaporation. Press-notes under the Central Excise and Salt Act only relaxed licensing requirements and did not displace proprietary rights, and a jagirdar&#039;s lease could not confer rights the lessor did not own.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 17:01:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (11) TMI 36 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172291</link>
      <description>The term &quot;minerals&quot; in section 231 of the Marwar Land Revenue Act was construed in its statutory and historical context, not as a narrow reference only to substances excavated from mines. Given the former State&#039;s treatment of salt as a controlled natural resource and its historical ownership and regulation of salt production, salt fell within the expression &quot;minerals&quot; even when produced by surface evaporation. Press-notes under the Central Excise and Salt Act only relaxed licensing requirements and did not displace proprietary rights, and a jagirdar&#039;s lease could not confer rights the lessor did not own.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>