<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 955 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172290</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the ITAT order for Assessment Year 2001-02. The appeal questioned the deletion of disallowance of interest on investment in capital work-in-progress. The High Court found that the issue had already been settled by a Supreme Court decision, and no substantial question of law remained. Hence, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 955 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172290</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the ITAT order for Assessment Year 2001-02. The appeal questioned the deletion of disallowance of interest on investment in capital work-in-progress. The High Court found that the issue had already been settled by a Supreme Court decision, and no substantial question of law remained. Hence, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>