<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 366 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172276</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the City Civil Court lacked jurisdiction in an eviction suit, despite the Rent Controller&#039;s previous rejection of eviction petitions. The appellant&#039;s argument that the Rent Controller&#039;s decisions constituted res judicata on jurisdiction was rejected, as jurisdiction is a pure question of law and cannot be conferred through res judicata principles. The appeal was dismissed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 12:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 366 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172276</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision that the City Civil Court lacked jurisdiction in an eviction suit, despite the Rent Controller&#039;s previous rejection of eviction petitions. The appellant&#039;s argument that the Rent Controller&#039;s decisions constituted res judicata on jurisdiction was rejected, as jurisdiction is a pure question of law and cannot be conferred through res judicata principles. The appeal was dismissed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>