<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 871 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172275</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court held that the prize received by the appellant did not constitute lottery income. The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities and quashing the addition of the prize money to the appellant&#039;s income. The Division Bench ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the amendments to the Act regarding lottery winnings were not retrospective and therefore did not apply to the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 871 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172275</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court held that the prize received by the appellant did not constitute lottery income. The Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities and quashing the addition of the prize money to the appellant&#039;s income. The Division Bench ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the amendments to the Act regarding lottery winnings were not retrospective and therefore did not apply to the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>