<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 628 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172270</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles when rectifying administrative mistakes. The judgment stressed the need for fair hearings, proper inquiries, and charge framing before disciplinary actions. It highlighted the importance of providing individuals with opportunities to defend against misconduct allegations and ensuring transparent rectification processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 628 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172270</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles when rectifying administrative mistakes. The judgment stressed the need for fair hearings, proper inquiries, and charge framing before disciplinary actions. It highlighted the importance of providing individuals with opportunities to defend against misconduct allegations and ensuring transparent rectification processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>