<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 777 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172266</link>
    <description>Section 17(4) of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 was held intra vires Parliament because, on its true character, the provision regulated educational standards and coordinated teacher education under Entry 66 of List I; its incidental effect on employment eligibility did not convert it into legislation on recruitment or service conditions. The refusal to recognise the B.Ed. (Vacation Course) was also upheld, as recognition was left to the expert statutory body charged with maintaining standards and the challenge based on natural justice did not displace that regulatory assessment. The High Court&#039;s contrary view was set aside, the appeals were allowed, and the writ petitions were remitted on surviving issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 17:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 777 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172266</link>
      <description>Section 17(4) of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 was held intra vires Parliament because, on its true character, the provision regulated educational standards and coordinated teacher education under Entry 66 of List I; its incidental effect on employment eligibility did not convert it into legislation on recruitment or service conditions. The refusal to recognise the B.Ed. (Vacation Course) was also upheld, as recognition was left to the expert statutory body charged with maintaining standards and the challenge based on natural justice did not displace that regulatory assessment. The High Court&#039;s contrary view was set aside, the appeals were allowed, and the writ petitions were remitted on surviving issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>