https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262722 The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of services as works contract service from 01/6/2007. The extended period for demand from April 2001 to 31/06/2007 was not applicable due to the appellants' belief about non-payment of tax before 01/6/2007. Penalties were not imposed as the appellants had a genuine belief. No show cause notice was issued for demanding duty post 01/6/2007. The appeals by the appellants were allowed, while those by the Revenue were dismissed, and the Cross Objection was disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262722 The appeals were allowed in favor of the appellants regarding the classification of services as works contract service from 01/6/2007. The extended period for demand from April 2001 to 31/06/2007 was not applicable due to the appellants' belief about non-payment of tax before 01/6/2007. Penalties were not imposed as the appellants had a genuine belief. No show cause notice was issued for demanding duty post 01/6/2007. The appeals by the appellants were allowed, while those by the Revenue were dismissed, and the Cross Objection was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 06 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262722