<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 630 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262713</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to entertain appeals where the appellant had already conceded the position before the Tribunal and the Tribunal had passed its order on that concessional basis. In light of the recorded concession, the Court found no basis for further adjudication and dismissed the appeals. The operative point was that a party could not seek appellate consideration after having accepted the position before the Tribunal, when the impugned order itself rested on that concession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:50:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 630 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262713</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to entertain appeals where the appellant had already conceded the position before the Tribunal and the Tribunal had passed its order on that concessional basis. In light of the recorded concession, the Court found no basis for further adjudication and dismissed the appeals. The operative point was that a party could not seek appellate consideration after having accepted the position before the Tribunal, when the impugned order itself rested on that concession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>