<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 629 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262712</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the civil appeal on the ground that the tax effect was only Rs. 1,20,000 with penalty of Rs. 20,000, and no further merits were examined. The order reflects that the monetary threshold alone was treated as sufficient reason for dismissal, leaving the underlying excise dispute undecided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:50:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 629 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262712</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the civil appeal on the ground that the tax effect was only Rs. 1,20,000 with penalty of Rs. 20,000, and no further merits were examined. The order reflects that the monetary threshold alone was treated as sufficient reason for dismissal, leaving the underlying excise dispute undecided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>