https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262710 The court allowed the petition, quashing the prohibition order dated 28.02.2015. Emphasizing the need for a fair hearing before restricting business activities, the court found the order premature, issued without jurisdiction, and based on pending allegations. Ruling in favor of the petitioner, the court upheld their right to conduct business in compliance with the law, highlighting procedural fairness in such prohibitive actions. en-us Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 May 2016 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262710 The court allowed the petition, quashing the prohibition order dated 28.02.2015. Emphasizing the need for a fair hearing before restricting business activities, the court found the order premature, issued without jurisdiction, and based on pending allegations. Ruling in favor of the petitioner, the court upheld their right to conduct business in compliance with the law, highlighting procedural fairness in such prohibitive actions. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262710