<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 624 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s findings that there was no clandestine removal of goods and that the Department had produced no evidence to support its allegation on the use of imported inputs were treated as pure findings of fact. On that basis, no substantial question of law was shown to arise for further consideration. The appeals were therefore dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:49:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 624 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s findings that there was no clandestine removal of goods and that the Department had produced no evidence to support its allegation on the use of imported inputs were treated as pure findings of fact. On that basis, no substantial question of law was shown to arise for further consideration. The appeals were therefore dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>