<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (6) TMI 216 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172262</link>
    <description>A statutory removal power may validly exclude a pre-decisional hearing where the legislative scheme shows a conscious intent to dispense with prior notice, and natural justice will not be read into the provision in the absence of ambiguity. The power remains legally controlled if it can be exercised only on relevant material showing incapacity, refusal to work, or conduct prejudicial to the Board&#039;s interest. Judicial review is limited to whether the satisfaction was bona fide and based on material. Removal based on relevant material and exercised in public interest was upheld, and the mala fides challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (6) TMI 216 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172262</link>
      <description>A statutory removal power may validly exclude a pre-decisional hearing where the legislative scheme shows a conscious intent to dispense with prior notice, and natural justice will not be read into the provision in the absence of ambiguity. The power remains legally controlled if it can be exercised only on relevant material showing incapacity, refusal to work, or conduct prejudicial to the Board&#039;s interest. Judicial review is limited to whether the satisfaction was bona fide and based on material. Removal based on relevant material and exercised in public interest was upheld, and the mala fides challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>