https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172260 Section 49(2)(b) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 was read as an exception to Section 167(2) CrPC, permitting a request for police custody even after the initial thirty-day period when the accused is already in judicial custody. Section 49(2)(a) only extends the detention period by substituting thirty days for fifteen days, while the separate proviso in Section 49(2)(b) governs police-custody applications from judicial custody. The affidavit requirement and explanation for delay were treated as safeguards showing that the power is subject to judicial scrutiny and is not unconfined. en-us Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172260 Section 49(2)(b) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 was read as an exception to Section 167(2) CrPC, permitting a request for police custody even after the initial thirty-day period when the accused is already in judicial custody. Section 49(2)(a) only extends the detention period by substituting thirty days for fifteen days, while the separate proviso in Section 49(2)(b) governs police-custody applications from judicial custody. The affidavit requirement and explanation for delay were treated as safeguards showing that the power is subject to judicial scrutiny and is not unconfined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172260