<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 655 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172258</link>
    <description>A disciplinary finding against an advocate must rest on reliable evidence and a reasoned appreciation of the record. The text states that the charge of professional misconduct was not sustained because the alleged engagement, fee payment and delivery of documents were not satisfactorily proved, and the complainant&#039;s cross-examination created serious doubt about the factual basis of the complaint. It also states that disciplinary orders affecting an advocate&#039;s professional standing must be speaking orders that disclose reasons and the evidentiary basis for the conclusion; a bare finding of guilt is insufficient where facts are disputed. On that basis, the disciplinary finding was set aside and the complaint dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:43:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 655 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172258</link>
      <description>A disciplinary finding against an advocate must rest on reliable evidence and a reasoned appreciation of the record. The text states that the charge of professional misconduct was not sustained because the alleged engagement, fee payment and delivery of documents were not satisfactorily proved, and the complainant&#039;s cross-examination created serious doubt about the factual basis of the complaint. It also states that disciplinary orders affecting an advocate&#039;s professional standing must be speaking orders that disclose reasons and the evidentiary basis for the conclusion; a bare finding of guilt is insufficient where facts are disputed. On that basis, the disciplinary finding was set aside and the complaint dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>