https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172256 An acquittal was upheld because the prosecution failed to prove the requisite sanction through the competent authority, and the witness examined did not establish that sanction had been granted; the supporting document was also not exhibited in evidence. The court reiterated that interference in an appeal against acquittal is justified only where there is a clear error in appreciating evidence or a miscarriage of justice. As the remaining evidence did not prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, no basis existed to restore the conviction. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:05:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172256 An acquittal was upheld because the prosecution failed to prove the requisite sanction through the competent authority, and the witness examined did not establish that sanction had been granted; the supporting document was also not exhibited in evidence. The court reiterated that interference in an appeal against acquittal is justified only where there is a clear error in appreciating evidence or a miscarriage of justice. As the remaining evidence did not prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, no basis existed to restore the conviction. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172256