<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (1) TMI 94 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172253</link>
    <description>The trial court initially awarded the respondent a sum of Rs. 8,817.59 for breach of contract and lack of reasonable notice upon termination of the agency. However, on appeal, the court overturned this decision, ruling that the respondent was not entitled to any decree as there was no obligation for reasonable notice in this case. Consequently, the respondent&#039;s award was set aside, and no costs were awarded due to the legal nature of the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (1) TMI 94 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172253</link>
      <description>The trial court initially awarded the respondent a sum of Rs. 8,817.59 for breach of contract and lack of reasonable notice upon termination of the agency. However, on appeal, the court overturned this decision, ruling that the respondent was not entitled to any decree as there was no obligation for reasonable notice in this case. Consequently, the respondent&#039;s award was set aside, and no costs were awarded due to the legal nature of the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>