<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (5) TMI 45 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172251</link>
    <description>Unanimous consent among directors may satisfy a statutory restriction on directors dealing with their company where no express board resolution is required, particularly where such dealings are contemplated by the articles and established practice. A general resolution authorising future member transactions does not itself constitute a contract or arrangement in which directors have an immediate personal interest. A prohibition on entering new futures in gur does not invalidate pre-existing outstanding futures without clear language to that effect. Settlement payments made as prudent commercial responses to market conditions do not establish fraud, misapplication of funds, or just and equitable grounds for winding up. Bona fide disputed debts requiring resolution in civil proceedings do not demonstrate inability to pay debts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:28:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (5) TMI 45 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172251</link>
      <description>Unanimous consent among directors may satisfy a statutory restriction on directors dealing with their company where no express board resolution is required, particularly where such dealings are contemplated by the articles and established practice. A general resolution authorising future member transactions does not itself constitute a contract or arrangement in which directors have an immediate personal interest. A prohibition on entering new futures in gur does not invalidate pre-existing outstanding futures without clear language to that effect. Settlement payments made as prudent commercial responses to market conditions do not establish fraud, misapplication of funds, or just and equitable grounds for winding up. Bona fide disputed debts requiring resolution in civil proceedings do not demonstrate inability to pay debts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>