<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 176 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172249</link>
    <description>Delay in filing one civil appeal was condoned, and the connected civil appeals were dismissed. The order records no substantive reasoning on the central excise dispute and does not set out any legal principle beyond the procedural disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 13:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 176 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172249</link>
      <description>Delay in filing one civil appeal was condoned, and the connected civil appeals were dismissed. The order records no substantive reasoning on the central excise dispute and does not set out any legal principle beyond the procedural disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>