<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (3) TMI 135 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172243</link>
    <description>In service equation under the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, the Central Government&#039;s determination was sustained because affected officers were later given an opportunity to make representations, and those representations were considered with the State Government&#039;s comments and the Advisory Committee&#039;s recommendations; the earlier absence of opportunity was treated as cured. The challenge based on breach of natural justice therefore failed. On the merits, the Court held that post-equation in reorganisation matters cannot be fixed with mathematical precision and judicial review is limited to whether the authority acted within the statutory framework on relevant material. As no irrelevant or extraneous consideration or mala fides was shown, the equation of posts was upheld and the High Court&#039;s interference was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:06:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (3) TMI 135 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172243</link>
      <description>In service equation under the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, the Central Government&#039;s determination was sustained because affected officers were later given an opportunity to make representations, and those representations were considered with the State Government&#039;s comments and the Advisory Committee&#039;s recommendations; the earlier absence of opportunity was treated as cured. The challenge based on breach of natural justice therefore failed. On the merits, the Court held that post-equation in reorganisation matters cannot be fixed with mathematical precision and judicial review is limited to whether the authority acted within the statutory framework on relevant material. As no irrelevant or extraneous consideration or mala fides was shown, the equation of posts was upheld and the High Court&#039;s interference was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>