<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 646 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172240</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision dismissing a writ petition as infructuous after the respondent&#039;s reinstatement following a tribunal&#039;s order. The Court clarified that implementing an order does not render a challenge to its validity moot. The case was remitted for fresh consideration on merits, emphasizing that the term &quot;infructuous&quot; does not automatically apply upon order implementation. The appeal was allowed without costs, with the Court refraining from expressing an opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 646 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172240</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision dismissing a writ petition as infructuous after the respondent&#039;s reinstatement following a tribunal&#039;s order. The Court clarified that implementing an order does not render a challenge to its validity moot. The case was remitted for fresh consideration on merits, emphasizing that the term &quot;infructuous&quot; does not automatically apply upon order implementation. The appeal was allowed without costs, with the Court refraining from expressing an opinion on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>