https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172239 The court did not grant a stay against the operation of the Central Excise Act or a judgment by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal. However, an interim stay against penalty recovery was granted based on the petitioner's assurance to pay excise duty without availing quantity discount and to settle the interest by a specified date. The court emphasized the importance of adherence to excise duty regulations and legal precedents in determining case outcomes, with the final opinion on differing facts reserved for the upcoming hearing. en-us Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Aug 2015 14:48:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172239 The court did not grant a stay against the operation of the Central Excise Act or a judgment by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal. However, an interim stay against penalty recovery was granted based on the petitioner's assurance to pay excise duty without availing quantity discount and to settle the interest by a specified date. The court emphasized the importance of adherence to excise duty regulations and legal precedents in determining case outcomes, with the final opinion on differing facts reserved for the upcoming hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172239