<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 581 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262664</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order rejecting the condonation of delay in filing the duty drawback application and remitted the matter to the first respondent for reconsideration. The court directed the first respondent to evaluate the applications, considering Rule 7A and the amendment to Rule 5 of the Rules, 1995, within three months. The court emphasized a pragmatic and liberal approach in condoning delays for genuine claims for duty drawback, citing relevant precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 581 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262664</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order rejecting the condonation of delay in filing the duty drawback application and remitted the matter to the first respondent for reconsideration. The court directed the first respondent to evaluate the applications, considering Rule 7A and the amendment to Rule 5 of the Rules, 1995, within three months. The court emphasized a pragmatic and liberal approach in condoning delays for genuine claims for duty drawback, citing relevant precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>