<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 573 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262656</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of CIT(A) and ITAT, affirming the validity of the assessee&#039;s claims for bad debt write-offs and the treatment of interest on sticky loans under the Income Tax Act and relevant CBDT Circulars. The appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed, in line with established judicial precedents and administrative guidelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:50:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 573 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262656</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of CIT(A) and ITAT, affirming the validity of the assessee&#039;s claims for bad debt write-offs and the treatment of interest on sticky loans under the Income Tax Act and relevant CBDT Circulars. The appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed, in line with established judicial precedents and administrative guidelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>