<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 568 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262651</link>
    <description>The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the appeal regarding the interpretation of rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The dispute arose from the admission and consideration of additional evidence by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in a case involving an assessee&#039;s loss for the assessment year 1998-99. The Department alleged a violation of rule 46A but failed to raise objections during the appeal process. The court emphasized the discretionary power of the Commissioner in admitting evidence under rule 46A and highlighted the Department&#039;s right to rebut such evidence. The appeal was dismissed, and the miscellaneous petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:50:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 568 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262651</link>
      <description>The Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed the appeal regarding the interpretation of rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The dispute arose from the admission and consideration of additional evidence by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in a case involving an assessee&#039;s loss for the assessment year 1998-99. The Department alleged a violation of rule 46A but failed to raise objections during the appeal process. The court emphasized the discretionary power of the Commissioner in admitting evidence under rule 46A and highlighted the Department&#039;s right to rebut such evidence. The appeal was dismissed, and the miscellaneous petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>