<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 566 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262649</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claim for additional depreciation under clause (iia) of section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for new machinery or plant acquired after March 31, 2005. The Court held that eligibility for additional depreciation under clause (iia) is separate from the original depreciation claim under clause (i) of section 32(1), irrespective of the type of assets involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2015 06:49:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 566 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262649</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the claim for additional depreciation under clause (iia) of section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for new machinery or plant acquired after March 31, 2005. The Court held that eligibility for additional depreciation under clause (iia) is separate from the original depreciation claim under clause (i) of section 32(1), irrespective of the type of assets involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>