<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 51 - ASSAM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172227</link>
    <description>A provision in the balance-sheet for an existing tax liability was treated as deductible in computing net wealth because the liability arose when the income was earned and was not contingent merely due to pending assessment. The court held that such a provision represents a present debt on the valuation date and falls within deductible liabilities unless specifically excluded by the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The retrospective amendment in section 2(m)(iii) was read as applying only to tax, penalty, or interest payable pursuant to an order already passed under the relevant enactments, and not to a liability where no assessment order had yet been made. The deduction was therefore allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:51:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 51 - ASSAM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172227</link>
      <description>A provision in the balance-sheet for an existing tax liability was treated as deductible in computing net wealth because the liability arose when the income was earned and was not contingent merely due to pending assessment. The court held that such a provision represents a present debt on the valuation date and falls within deductible liabilities unless specifically excluded by the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The retrospective amendment in section 2(m)(iii) was read as applying only to tax, penalty, or interest payable pursuant to an order already passed under the relevant enactments, and not to a liability where no assessment order had yet been made. The deduction was therefore allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>