<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1325 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172226</link>
    <description>Conditional permission to repair an existing bund did not authorise raising its height, dumping debris and boulders, closing culverts, or destroying mangroves. On the material described, the acts were treated as exceeding the scope of the Collector&#039;s order and court directions, with the record showing obstruction of sea-water flow and environmental damage to CRZ-I mangrove areas. The cited challenge to the notification was not considered on merits because it was already pending before the High Court. The stated result was that contempt was made out and restorative directions for removal of the offending constructions and restoration of the bund and culverts were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1325 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172226</link>
      <description>Conditional permission to repair an existing bund did not authorise raising its height, dumping debris and boulders, closing culverts, or destroying mangroves. On the material described, the acts were treated as exceeding the scope of the Collector&#039;s order and court directions, with the record showing obstruction of sea-water flow and environmental damage to CRZ-I mangrove areas. The cited challenge to the notification was not considered on merits because it was already pending before the High Court. The stated result was that contempt was made out and restorative directions for removal of the offending constructions and restoration of the bund and culverts were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>