<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 637 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172225</link>
    <description>Revisional power under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, though not subject to a fixed limitation period, must be exercised within a reasonable time, and the revisional authority must consider intervening events such as vesting, allotment, payment and possession before altering earlier proceedings. Where a municipal corporation has been allotted the land, paid the price and taken possession, it is a person directly affected by the revisional process and is entitled to notice and hearing before any adverse order is made. The governing principle is that vested rights cannot be displaced without timely exercise of jurisdiction and fair hearing to all affected parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 637 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172225</link>
      <description>Revisional power under Section 34 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, though not subject to a fixed limitation period, must be exercised within a reasonable time, and the revisional authority must consider intervening events such as vesting, allotment, payment and possession before altering earlier proceedings. Where a municipal corporation has been allotted the land, paid the price and taken possession, it is a person directly affected by the revisional process and is entitled to notice and hearing before any adverse order is made. The governing principle is that vested rights cannot be displaced without timely exercise of jurisdiction and fair hearing to all affected parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>