<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 456 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172223</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that in cases where a domestic inquiry is found defective but the dismissal is justified based on evidence, the dismissal order relates back to the date it was made by the employer. The appellant&#039;s dismissal was deemed effective from the date of the employer&#039;s order (November 18, 1981) and not the Labour Court&#039;s award date (December 11, 1985). The appellant was not entitled to relief, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 17:06:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=393401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 456 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172223</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that in cases where a domestic inquiry is found defective but the dismissal is justified based on evidence, the dismissal order relates back to the date it was made by the employer. The appellant&#039;s dismissal was deemed effective from the date of the employer&#039;s order (November 18, 1981) and not the Labour Court&#039;s award date (December 11, 1985). The appellant was not entitled to relief, and the appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>