https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172221 The appeals challenging the selection process for Assistant District Transport Officer (ADTO) posts were dismissed by the Supreme Court. The Court found that the criteria for selection were valid, rejected allegations of misrepresentation and mala fides by the appellants, and upheld the allocation of marks for interviews and additional qualifications. Calling more candidates for interviews did not impact the process, and the Court emphasized the consequences of misrepresentation in legal proceedings. The appellants were required to pay costs for their misrepresentation but were allowed to continue in service. en-us Thu, 22 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:33:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172221 The appeals challenging the selection process for Assistant District Transport Officer (ADTO) posts were dismissed by the Supreme Court. The Court found that the criteria for selection were valid, rejected allegations of misrepresentation and mala fides by the appellants, and upheld the allocation of marks for interviews and additional qualifications. Calling more candidates for interviews did not impact the process, and the Court emphasized the consequences of misrepresentation in legal proceedings. The appellants were required to pay costs for their misrepresentation but were allowed to continue in service. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 22 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172221