https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172215 An election to the office of Pradhan was liable to be set aside where an interim stay in earlier writ proceedings prevented two nominated members from voting and materially altered the result. The Court found the writ proceedings had not been bona fide and had been used to obtain an ex parte order that directly affected the electoral outcome. Because the excluded members would otherwise have voted, the successful candidate's victory was attributable to the court order. The Court also held that, in the absence of a statutory election forum capable of examining the validity of the High Court's own order, relief under Article 226 was the proper remedy. Fresh election was permitted under the Rules. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:44:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172215 An election to the office of Pradhan was liable to be set aside where an interim stay in earlier writ proceedings prevented two nominated members from voting and materially altered the result. The Court found the writ proceedings had not been bona fide and had been used to obtain an ex parte order that directly affected the electoral outcome. Because the excluded members would otherwise have voted, the successful candidate's victory was attributable to the court order. The Court also held that, in the absence of a statutory election forum capable of examining the validity of the High Court's own order, relief under Article 226 was the proper remedy. Fresh election was permitted under the Rules. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172215